| Type | Bug | Status | tested | Date | 3-Jan-2010 12:16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Version | alpha 95 | Category | Datatype | Submitted by | meijeru |
| Platform | All | Severity | minor | Priority | normal |
| Summary | Time overflow/underflow on date literals is not always correctly computed |
|---|---|
| Description |
Time overflow/underflow is correctly handled when date variables have their time component set to a value outside 0:00 .. 23:59. When specifying times outside these limits in a date literal, the situation is as follows: - positive time values > 23:59 are consistently refused - all negative time values are accepted, but no underflow is computed unless non-zero time-zone is specified (!) |
| Example code |
>> 3-Jan-2010/30:00 ** Syntax error: invalid "date" -- "3-Jan-2010/30:00" >> 3-Jan-2010/30:00+1:0 ** Syntax error: invalid "date" -- "3-Jan-2010/30:00+1:0" >> 3-Jan-2010/-30:00 == 3-Jan-2010/-30:00 >> 3-Jan-2010/-30:00+1:0 == 1-Jan-2010/18:00+1:00 |
| Assigned to | n/a | Fixed in | alpha 97 | Last Update | 8-Feb-2010 03:07 |
|---|
| Comments | |
|---|---|
|
(0001954)
Carl 4-Feb-2010 16:23 |
In DATE! form, negative time is now an error. |
| Date | User | Field | Action | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8-Feb-2010 03:07 | BrianH | Status | Modified | built => tested |
| 4-Feb-2010 16:23 | carl | Fixedin | Modified | => alpha 97 |
| 4-Feb-2010 16:23 | carl | Status | Modified | reviewed => built |
| 4-Feb-2010 16:23 | carl | Comment : 0001954 | Added | - |
| 12-Jan-2010 21:05 | carl | Status | Modified | submitted => reviewed |
| 3-Jan-2010 12:26 | meijeru | Description | Modified | - |
| 3-Jan-2010 12:26 | meijeru | Code | Modified | - |
| 3-Jan-2010 12:16 | meijeru | Ticket | Added | - |