Type | Bug | Status | reviewed | Date | 23-Jul-2009 11:21 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Version | alpha 76 | Category | Native | Submitted by | Ladislav |
Platform | All | Severity | minor | Priority | normal |
Summary | EQUIV? decimal! comparison not exact enough to be transitive |
---|---|
Description | the original idea was, that the EQUIV? comparison would be finer than the EQUAL? function and transitive. The test below yielding False at present actually proves, that the EQUIV? comparison isn't transitive currently. |
Example code |
[not equiv? to decimal! #{3FD3333333333333} to decimal! #{3FD3333333333334}] |
Assigned to | n/a | Fixed in | - | Last Update | 4-Nov-2010 23:55 |
---|
Comments | |
---|---|
(0001412)
BrianH 23-Jul-2009 15:37 |
Changed to a bug, and reworded the summary accordingly. |
(0002796)
Ladislav 4-Nov-2010 23:55 |
in the core-tests suite |
Date | User | Field | Action | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|
4-Nov-2010 23:55 | Ladislav | Comment : 0002796 | Added | - |
23-Jul-2009 15:46 | BrianH | Summary | Modified | EQUIV? decimal! comparison not exact enough => EQUIV? decimal! comparison not exact enough to be transitive |
23-Jul-2009 15:37 | BrianH | Comment : 0001412 | Added | - |
23-Jul-2009 15:37 | BrianH | Summary | Modified | EQUIV? comparison and decimals => EQUIV? decimal! comparison not exact enough |
23-Jul-2009 15:36 | BrianH | Category | Modified | Unspecified => Native |
23-Jul-2009 15:36 | BrianH | Status | Modified | submitted => reviewed |
23-Jul-2009 15:36 | BrianH | Type | Modified | Note => Bug |
23-Jul-2009 11:21 | Ladislav | Ticket | Added | - |